That's one of my biggest problems with art communities in general, the idea that things must have some sort of meaning or motivation behind it.
Reminds me of my highschool art class (damn you mandatory art credit). One day the teacher comes in with a bunch of magazines and asks us to tear through them and make something that has a "Deep message".
So I just decided to bullshit the project. I found a picture of a grumpy guy, cut out the head, then found another picture of mushrooms and put the mushrooms on the head. Glued both to a blank white paper and called it a day. Teacher saw me not doing anything and came over to ask what the problem was, told her I was done and pointed to it. She asked if she was supposed to believe I was done and asked whether or not I was really getting into the spirit of the project, so I decided to bullshit some more.
Paraphrasing because this was years ago, but it was something like this: "Of course there's a deep message Ms.____ , can't you see it? The man with the angry face is symbolic of people's continual dissatisfaction with society no matter how it changes, the mushrooms on his head are symbolic of the decay of thought people experience when they indulge in nothing but media consumption, such as reading magazines, and the blank space is a representation of a blank canvas, because everyone's life is like a canvas that is gradually being painted, and mine still has a lot of empty space."
I got an A.